-
NW

Over the weekend I watched a film called “NW”. It is based on a book by the same name by Zadie Smith. NW stands for north west, no it’s not about Kanye West’s daughter. I hope that doesn’t disappoint you. NW refers to the British postal code of north west London where the principle characters of the film grew up together in a housing project. The film circles around two girlhood friends Natalie and Leah who are now in their thirties with families and careers.
I thought this was a great story and a very well made, meticulously cast movie. It kind of reminds me of the 2005 movie “Crash”. “Crash” took place in Los Angeles and had a large cast of ethnically diverse characters with different lots in life. The people in the story seemed to have nothing in common other than living in the megapolis of LA but their lives are all intertwined through a series of events.
“NW” operates in a similar fashion. The characters range in social status and experiences. People that you wouldn’t expect to cross paths do. There are two other characters in the film that grew up in northwest London. And just like in real life it’s interesting to see how people with similar starting points take different paths and end up in very different places in life years later.
“NW” is a story and commentary on race, class, femininity, masculinity, identity and how it all intersects. The mainstreamed, straight laced people make questionable moral decisions and have unrighteous motivations. You will loathe some of the respectable characters for their deceit and arrogance while some of the edgy ones display honesty, decency and even honor and chivalry.
I don’t believe that Hollywood would or could have made this film. I don’t think they would have made the right casting decisions. The casting choices were very important to the telling of the story. I can tell that the actors were chosen deliberately and the film makers did a great job of choosing personnel.
It took a lot of sensitivity and cultural awareness to be able to choose actors and to understand the cultural nuances involved in being Black, mixed an immigrant and White. Kudos to them. I have a hard time picturing Hollywood placing Nikki Amuka-Bird in the role of a trophy wife. But traditional Hollywood would have seen Zoe Kravitz or Zendaya more suitable for the part of a wealthy man’s wife not a woman so…Black. She nailed it though.

O.T. Fagbenle gave a great performance in “NW”. I was reading about the cast after watching it and the article mentioned one of the actors is in “The Handmaid’s Tale”. I was confused because I’ve been watching “Handmaid’s Tale” and I wasn’t making the connection. Fagbenle plays June’s husband Luke in “Handmaid’s Tale” and Felix in “NW”. He is one heck of an actor because his appearance was not drastically different from one part to the other but he was completely unrecognizable to me. He even appeared about ten years younger in “NW” even though the movie aired on BBC in 2016.

There is a lot that can be said about this film but I actually don’t want to spoil it for anyone that hasn’t seen it and may want to watch. It’s a mature and thought provoking movie with no real heroes and no easy answers. I would recommend it if you are looking for something to watch.
Here is a link to the film if you can tolerate sparkly stars framing your movies. Enjoy. I just got a copy from my local library.
-
Crazy Rich Asians

I’ve been on a movie kick lately. I recently watched “Crazy Rich Asians”. It was great. I’m not much of a cry baby so I love any movie, book, commercial, sporting event that brings tears to my eyes. “Crazy Rich Asians” did that.
WARNING: This brief review contains spoilers!
It’s a very sweet movie and an old fashioned romance. I love a good romance but Hollywood doesn’t make many of those anymore. There’s not much to say about the plot because it really is working from Hollywood’s formula for romances. Honestly, you’ve probably seen a movie like this before.
Man and woman are in love. Everything is great. There’s a conflict which threatens to destroy the relationship. It does. The woman leaves. The man realizes he doesn’t want to live without the woman. He pursues her and stops her before the plane, train, bus takes off. She looks into his eyes with longing and realizes she doesn’t want to live without him either. She gets off of the bus, train or plane and runs into his arms.
The end.
There’s not much more to it than that. If you’ve seen this type of film before and enjoyed it watch “Crazy Rich Asians” if you haven’t already. Have tissue paper handy.
-
Victoria and Abdul

A few days ago I watched the 2017 release “Victoria and Abdul”. It was OK. It was watchable to me because I enjoy period, historical dramas and the British royal family is interesting to me. The actors in the film did as good of a job as I think anyone could with the material they were given. This film could have been a complete disaster in the hands of the wrong film makers.
If you plan on watching this movie and you don’t like spoilers do not proceed. I don’t feel guilty about the spoilers in this movie because it isn’t a current release and it’s based on historical facts. Consider yourself warned.
So Abdul is a young man from India that worked in some sort of clerical position for a government office in colonial India. He was selected and ordered to travel to India to present the Queen Victoria with a coin that was being given to her as a gift from the people of India. When I say Abdul was selected to travel to India I mean he was ordered along with another government worker named Mohammed.
Once Abdul and Mohammed arrive in England they have to present the Queen with the coin that bears her likeness. They are ceremonial colored people. The pair are instructed not to make eye contact with the Queen and once she has been presented her coin on silver platter they are to back away. Abdul makes eye contact with Victoria while making his exit. The Queen remarks that she thinks that he is handsome.
Abdul and Mohammed are required to serve Queen Victoria at a different dinner. At this event after serving the Queen her dessert Abdul shockingly drops to his knees and kisses her feet. I’m unsure of why he did that but the Queen took a liking to him after that. He becomes her confidante, tutor and spiritual advisor. Much to the consternation of Mohammed their stay in England is prolonged.
Abdul irritated me throughout 90% of this movie. This grown, married man who had achieved some level of education was forced to travel to gloomy England and serve the Queen that stole their country and oppressed his people. Yet he was infatuated with her. I don’t understand it.
I really don’t understand the nature of Abdul’s feelings towards Victoria. She is the queen of the nation that colonized his country. Any healthy person would harbor resentment. I couldn’t tell if he admired her position of power, looked to her as a mother figure or if he had an attraction to her. Perhaps it was all three.
I can accept a platonic friendship or a loving surrogate mother/son relationship. But I felt at times that the film was hinting at romance and trying to create sexual tension. Victoria was a mother of nine and she was eighty one years old in the film. She had a long list of health problems. She was a woman well past her prime. I was hoping Abdul wasn’t so intrigued by the idea of having the attention of a White woman that he saw past all this. I was watching this movie like “Have some pride for goodness sakes Abdul she’s dying!”.
Particularly since he had a good Muslim, young, attractive, Indian wife back home. During a conversation between Victoria and Abdul his wife came up. The Queen was a bit disappointed and dismayed by the news and she felt betrayed that she had not been told about her. Then The Queen requested that Abdul’s wife be brought to England. Once again, this was an order not a request or suggestion.
The most interesting and relatable character in the movie was Mohammed who traveled to England with Abdul. He was a man with pride and looked at the world in a practical and realistic way. He resented having to travel to England, he hated England, he was upset with Abdul for prolonging their stay and he saw the British as settlers that oppressed the people of India.

Nonetheless, he was employed by their government in his homeland. I’m sure he saw his employment opportunity as the best deal that was being offered. I’ve learned that taken the best deal that is offered to you is a lot of what life is about. As a Black woman in America I strongly identify with Mohammed.
The relationship between Victoria and Abdul deepens and one day the monarch dies. The queens family and household staff resented Abdul and the attention he had from the queen. Once the queen passed away Abdul and his wife and mother in law were sent back to India. The queen’s son, Bertie Prince of Wales destroyed evidence of his influence over the royal palace.
A statue was erected near the Taj Mahal. Abdul lived nearby and visited the statue in the last scene of “Victoria & Abdul”. He was visibly aged and he kissed the feet of the statue and looked at it with adulation. Abdul had years to reflect on his banishment from the place that he grew to love and call home, the disrespect and poor treatment he received from everyone but the queen and the attempt the queen’s son made to completely erase his presence at the palace.
Abdul buried Mohammed, who proved himself to be a loyal friend, in England. Mohammed never wanted to come there and was anxious to return to India. Mohammed died in the royal palace as a prisoner to Queen Victoria.
He never came to realize that he and the queen were never on a level playing field and she pulled rank in the relationship on several occasions. The Queen Victoria loved, enjoyed, admired and in some ways respected Abdul. But she still looked upon him the way one views a pet. She didn’t really see him as a man.
I was frustrated with Abdul throughout this film. I think the director wanted to create a “Driving Miss Daisy” vibe but it didn’t happen in this film. I haven’t seen that film in years but if I recollect correctly Hoke put Miss Daisy in her place once or twice. There was mutual respect between the two of them even if they weren’t seen as peers outside of their relationship. Queen Victoria complained of having a long life as a queen but she never let Abdul know that she was queen and he was her subject.
I didn’t really like the film for personal reasons. But it’s actually OK. It runs for about two hours and the story sails along. I never look at a clock to figure out how much longer it was going to last. The setting and costumes were fun. I always like learning something new about history. And the actors were quite good. I don’t think you will hate it if you watch.
-
Watch “Men and Women’s Roles in Church and Beyond” on YouTube
-
Watch “Let Men Pursue and Prove Themselves 2 Timothy 3:6, Proverbs 18:22” on YouTube
-
Watch “Modern Womanhood” on YouTube
-
Untitled
Today I was browsing target.com and I ran across a pair of gold toned, chunky, bamboo earrings. I was kind of floored to see them. I remember that style of earring being popular in the late 80s and early 90s. Big, bold, gold hoops were once only popular among Black and Hispanic women in urban areas. They were lampooned for it. Big hoops were thought of as ghetto, uncouth and too flashy to be chic. So are they still ghetto now that suburban soccer moms and hipsters will be wearing them?

I’ve seen this before. I grew up in the 80s and 90s outside of Detroit. The fashion industry has promoted styles within the last ten years that I remember inner city women and men wearing thirty years prior. Back then that style of dress would have made a person unemployable. So it’s interesting to see urban styles marketed as chic and trendy when the fashion industry is actually decades behind the trend.
I ran across this article a few years ago in Lucky magazine a few years ago.

Sorry but Zooey Deschanel is the last person I think of when I think of nail art. No celebrity comes to mind when I think about nail designs. The popularity of nail art has grass roots. Grass that sprung up in between slabs of concrete. Nail art has been a fashion staple across America’s big cities for decades. It was hood until Zooey Deschanel and Lucky magazine said it wasn’t.
I’m not one to get angry about cultural appropriation because I live in a multi cultural society and cultures rub off on each other. But it’s unfair the way that anything that is associated with Black Americans is looked down on but a White stylists or buyer copies an urban fashion, brings it to the White masses who think that it is something new and all of a sudden it’s a new trend and it’s origins are forgotten. Then people tell African Americans that we have no culture and some African Americas seem to agree and wait for the White mainstream stamp of approval.
We have culture but we often turn our noses down at it in order to assimilate into the dominant culture. Instead of Blacks passing it down to our own children another ethnic group ends up selling our culture back to a different generation of Black Americans. It’s honestly our own fault and we should know better by now. But we keep falling for the okey doke. This cycle also happens in music and the restaurant industry.

Black people need to appreciate their own creativity and originality. Stop joining in the chorus of folks labeling something as ghetto in order to fit in to polite society. Something is either tacky and uncouth across the board or it isn’t. The marketing is the difference. Black people should protect their culture and proudly claim it. Don’t wait for a White reality star to make you chic. Learn to market your own culture instead of complaining when someone else figures out a way to make a buck off of it.
I’m sure glad that I saved my gigantic Turkish link gold hoop earrings from the 90s.
-
Watch “women in christ” on YouTube
-
Untitled
I enjoy social media because you learn the truth about people. Often times the truth is not pretty but it is the truth and there is always value in that. I’ve run across social media outlets that are geared towards men. The most common topic in these male spaces is women. They talk about their desires, complaints and preferences when it comes to the opposite sex. I will refer to them as The Complainers.
After eavesdropping on The Complainers and sometimes participating in some of these conversations I’ve found it very hard to follow the thought pattern of these men. I can’t figure out the end game. I feel like there is no real desire to come to an understanding with women and have respectful relationships. The on line commentary mostly expresses frustration and disdain for women. Love and partnership is rarely if ever mentioned.
These on line chats are under the guise of them being for men but I really think they exist to send messages to women while excluding them from the conversation. I think the goal is to manipulate women and to control them through criticism because it seems that women can’t do anything to satisfy these men. It’s rare that one of the complainers mentions a wife or girlfriend.
These are just a few of the contradictions that I’ve seen on The Complainers’ social media chats.
Women should stop wearing weave. -> Your hair is nappy and too short.
Women need to get off of welfare -> A college degree doesn’t make you more valuable to men.
Single mothers are undateable. -> Men shouldn’t get married.
All women are promiscuous. -> I would use her for a pump and dump but that’s it.
Women without fathers are damaged goods. -> Women are responsible for raising children.
Women are choosing careers over families. -> Women should be willing to split finances 50/50.
Women always pick the wrong guys. -> Women have unrealistic standards.
It’s OK for men to have preferences. -> Women that date outside of their race are bedwenches.
Women should commit young. -> Men should marry no sooner that their late thirties.
Women shouldn’t pressure men to commit. -> Women hit “The Wall” at thirty five.
Women seek out attention too much -> Women should welcome male attention in public.
Women focus on their looks too much -> Everyone wants to date someone attractive.

What conclusion can women come to after taking in this information? The only conclusion that I can reach is that there is some serious confusion out there along with disdain for women. Women’s humanity and intellect is completely overlooked and women are talked about as if they are inanimate objects.
I’ve never seen anyone go into detail about what perfection looks like and how to achieve it. The standards that The Complainers have is not sustainable or realistic because they want old fashioned, traditional womanhood without offering old fashioned traditional manhood. They complain about feminism but they fail to see how feminism benefits men. I think that men are the real benefactors of feminism because they don’t bear the same amount of responsibility as they once did. There aren’t very many expectations for men anymore.
If any man wanted an old fashioned relationship he just needs to decide that he wants to be an old fashioned man and then he needs to find a woman to go along with those ideals. I can see how that would be a challenge but I don’t think it’s impossible if a man is taking the lead, is realistic about his end of the bargain and expresses his intentions. Simply don’t date feminists if they bother you so much.
I think The Complainers know that they are not being completely honest in what they say but they aren’t willing to speak their truth. The truth is that they want to the best of both worlds. They like the lack of responsibility and easy sex that feminism provides but when they are ready to settle down in their later years they want a submissive housewife.
Actually The Complainer just a submissive woman because they don’t believe in legal marriage because if the relationship doesn’t work out he doesn’t want to give her any of the household finances. But he doesn’t want her to be educated and career oriented. And he wants her to be focused on the household and family.
It’s a never ending circle of contradictions that only completely benefits men. The Complainers simply want to use women as tools to validate their ego, breed their children, cook and clean. Meanwhile he doesn’t want to have any responsibility to his wife equivalent. The Complainers like to say that career women end up lonely and they use examples like forty something singles like Tiffany Haddish and Charlize Theron.
I believe there is a price to pay for women being career focused. I believe that a woman that puts her career first probably does miss out on some opportunities to marry and have children. But The Complainers all seem like douchebags anyway. They have no respect for women and they don’t discuss love or even raising children much. When they discuss childbearing they talk about women as if they are prized pit bulls or thoroughbred horses. I don’t think The Complainers offer much as far as a lifetime of love and devotion.
I’ve learned to disregard everything that The Complainers say. Even when they make valid points they say something mean which lets me know their true intentions and unsaid feelings. I hope the women make decisions that benefit themselves and honor God. Prepare yourself to be a good wife to a deserving man. But trying to satisfy the desires of men that want women to exist simply for the pleasure and convenience of men seems like a lost cause.
