-
Untitled
Joy 105 Com is a You Tube channel that plays videos of lectures of Christian leaders. Most of the videos feature a Black speaker. This channel is very disappointing and embarrassing. I have never been present for sermons like this in person and I wouldn’t attend one of these churches or conferences. Most of the churches I’ve attended have been churches with large Black congregations and/or had Black leadership. I’ve only seen this nonsense on You Tube not in person. Joy 105 Com likely looks for content that will get views and foolishness gets views. However it concerns me that there is so much of this content available. Good grief.
Joy 105 is a Contemporary Christian radio station based in the southeastern US. They say the goal of their social media posts is to start conversations. All conversations are not constructive. Some conversations start drama and create dissension. I looked at their website and the radio personalities are White but the buffoonery the post to You Tube is from Black churches. This is a Christian media outlet but they are not glorifying God and His word. They are glorifying nonsense and possibly racial bias.
I had to cut down the videos to post on this blog. Unfortunately, there is a lot to choose from. Feel free to look for yourself. I think there is an unhealthy relationship with sexuality, masculinity and femininity in Black churches and perhaps Black culture overall. There needs to be some Bible study, prayer, repentance and action on this matter.
There is blatant hostility towards women on display in a pulpit. There is a desire to control women and their choices. In this context the women at the center of the hostility, belittling, controlling, manipulative, gas lighting language are Black women. These speakers focus on telling women what they need to do in order to serve their husband and their choice of a husband. The role of wife is presented as one of servitude. Joy 105 Com features a few, about three, videos directed towards men. The vast majority of the content about dating and marriage is directed towards women and telling them what they need to do for a man.
I recognize that there is gray area. The speakers may be well intended, there may be some wisdom there and they were speaking to a group of people that may all be very familiar with each other and we are the outsiders missing some context. They aren’t totally wrong in what they’re saying but I think they are lacking spiritual guidance behind their message. I think they could be a lot nicer and more respectful towards women. Women need to learn to stand up for ourselves and stop going along with every stupid thing a man says.
Women need to have higher standards for men. That’s not only a matter of dating or marriage. It’s a matter of how women allow men to speak to them and about them. Women need to stop seeking male approval and validation from men that don’t respect, like them or are nice to them. Women need to stop seeking validation from men that are unkind to them and fail to see their humanity and are threatened by their femininity and sexuality.
I have not know Beyonce or Oprah to present themselves as Christian women. There is no reason for a preacher to critique either of them from a pulpit. I think the pastor resents them for being popular, powerful and wealthy women. There is no reason to discuss either of them from a pulpit. All of these matters require Black churches to look at the Bible with fresh eyes, prayer and open hearts.
Church members better study their Bible in order to discern worthwhile preaching. Women in the church need to see their worth and demand that clergy see it as well. Men in the church need to examine their thought patterns and eliminate misogynistic attitudes towards Black women, femininity and sexuality. If they only see Black women as servants they have no business serving them as clergy members.
-
America Can Not Exist Without the Bible 2 Corinthians 3:17
-
Summer Vacation 2024: Oppenheimer: The Real Story
I watched “Oppenheimer: The Real Story” by accident. This is a documentary on physicist Robert Oppenheimer. This is not the 2023 film “Oppenheimer” starring Cillian Murphy. It took me a few minutes to realize I was watching the wrong movie but it was still interesting so I stuck with it.
“Oppenheimer: The Real Story” is worth the watch. It’s about the scientist that lead the research on developing the nuclear weapons that were dropped on Japan and ended WWII. I highly recommend this film. Robert Oppenheimer played a pivotal role in recent American history but I never heard the name Oppenheimer until the movie “Oppenheimer” debuted last year.

Robert Oppenheimer was born to a well to do family in New York City in 1904. He was very bright but socially awkward. Robert received the best education money could buy. His studies included Harvard and Cambridge. Oppenheimer also taught at prestigious universities including UC Berkeley. He was later recruited to work in the dessert southwestern United States to lead the Manhattan Project which conducted research on nuclear weapons.
After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended WWII there was conflict between president Truman and Oppenheimer. Truman wanted Oppenheimer to continue his research on nuclear weapons to remain competitive with the Soviet Union. Oppenheimer had concerns about continuing the research and some guilty feelings about the suffering that his bombs caused in Japan.
Oppenheimer was removed from his assignment as a lead and managing scientist. It amounted to a matter of workplace politics and back stabbing. He was outcast from the scientific community and lost his government security clearance.
“Oppenheimer: The Real Story” is a great documentary and I learned something new. The subject matter is very interesting especially as a Gen Xer that remembers Cold War politics. I plan on watching the award winning film “Oppenheimer” in the future.
-
Enjoy your Sunday. ❤️✝️⛪️
-
Sunday 🙂❤️⛪️
-
Summer Vacation 2024: Golda
I recently watched the 2023 film “Golda”. It’s the story of the former prime minister Golda Meir and the Yom Kippur War of 1973. Golda Meir is played by Helen Mirren. This movie is educational and I learned some things that I didn’t know. This film could be of interest to many due to the current war between Israel and Hamas.
“Golda” focuses on military strategy of the war the Yom Kippur War between Israel and an Arab alliance. If you enjoy documentaries on the Military Channel on cable you will love this film. I’m more interested in the human stories of history. For me this movie is interesting but it’s just OK.
-
Untitled
What don’t you like about your job? Leans forward. 🤨
What don’t you like about your boss? Side eye. 😒
Why are you looking for a new job? Fake smile. ☺️
Job interviews are messy. Hiring managers are often more interested in hearing job drama stories than they are qualifications, skills, experience and education. I feel like the questions are invasive and cross polite and professional boundaries. They are plain nosy.
“Why do you want to work here?“😊
This question is stupid. It’s hard to answer stupid questions without coming across as sassy or confused. The answer is I saw an ad on the internet and filled out an application. They aren’t too far from my home and they are likely to offer a decent compensation package. It’s just that simple. I’m unsure what they want me to tell them.
“How do you handle a conflict with a co worker?”😊
This question is a set up and there is no good answer. It’s hard to answer this question because I generally get along with people. By get along I mean I don’t get into many arguments. At all. It’s not worth it and I refuse. At work I’m polite to others and I focus on my responsibilities. Interviewers are trying to get a story out of applicants when there likely isn’t a story to tell.
Sure, I have worked with people that weren’t my cup of tea. It’s not that much of a problem because I wasn’t that invested in anyone at the job. I wasn’t motivated by relationships with co workers good or bad. I was there to work. There were times I quit a job if it was a negative and hostile environment however there were other factors. After weighing the pros and cons it was better to leave the job because it wasn’t worth the work place dynamics. That’s fair.
HR managers know that people at work can be mean girls(and boys), snakes and creeps. That’s why there are mandatory meetings on sexual harassment and other HR matters. If there was a conflict it doesn’t benefit the applicant to discuss the matter because the hiring manager doesn’t know the other parties involved. It’s all going to reflect on the applicant in a negative way.
Gossip Mongers 👀😊
Privacy and discretion is important in a professional life. There is no way to tell a story about a conflict with a co worker, what you don’t like about your boss or work place without telling a negative story about them. They are asking you to gossip and spill the beans about your past or current employer. That’s messy as hell to me.
Even if I don’t like my job, co workers or supervisor I know them. I don’t know the interviewer. At that point the company I’m interviewing with hasn’t offered me on dime. My loyalty is to the place that offered me an opportunity and has paid me a check. It’s also not very professional to get dressed up and show up somewhere to talk crap about someone else or an organization. At times I think HR just want to gather information about other companies via interviews. I’m not going for it.
How often do you think it’s acceptable to call off work? 😊
Many years ago I went to an interview at Target and was asked this question. I rarely miss a day of work without scheduling it. I rarely missed school when I was growing up. It was a trick question that I really couldn’t answer based on my own experience. Situational questions are designed that way. The answers that the applicant gives can be applied any way the hiring managers want because the situations are hypothetical. It’s highly manipulative and a time wasting scam.
Situational job interview question are designed to get you to talk in a round about and vague way while the interviewer says next to nothing about the role, company or themselves. Then they leave it up to you to ask a bunch of questions about the role. Job titles are fairly straightforward and I read the job description when I applied. Companies can be researched on the internet and social media. I’m unsure what questions they want me to ask them that I can’t research for myself.
Hiring managers should discuss their personal expectations and values. They should discuss what a day is like in that role and what makes an applicant stand out. They should discuss my application, portfolio and resume as opposed to vague questions. I’m convinced most job interview are not serious and the job will be filled by a predetermined applicant. I also think interviews are set up as busy work for recruiters so they maintain employment.
I think job interviews are often a waste of time. They are messy, unprofessional, lazy and gossipy. I don’t believe companies are evaluating applicants based on professional qualifications or really trying to get to know an individual.
They’re intentions are questionable. I feel that way because they barely ask about experience and education as it applies to the job opening. That’s especially true when the interviewer seems disinterested or hostile throughout the interview. Hiring managers are agents of chaos and confusion.
-
Thank you Jesus for all you have done! 🙌🏿✝️
